The Great Unifier, Introduced

JAE Likes the Drugs!

The "Great Unifier" Ponders his First Significant Separation!
Labels: korean embassy


Labels: korean embassy
Labels: korean embassy
On the lotus curtain fragrant incense spreads Outside light rain wakes apricot blossoms Under a pavilion awning the bell before dawn wakes a dream Forsythia next to a pond a thrush calls out. A spring day, swallows fattens and I shut myself in Lethargic hands, the golden needle stopped its work Butterflies in pairs waft off from flowers And competes to follow the withering flowers in garden shades Shivery cold permeates into the green skirt Spring breeze cuts through the longing heart Who can understand the emptiness inside? Lovebirds dance in myriad of flowers. The color of spring deepens in Hwangsayang's villa Red and green shimmers on silken window screen The fragrant grass distresses (creates uneasiness) | On the lotus curtain fragrant incense spreads Light rain wakes apricot blossoms in their beds Under a pavilion awning a dream is broken by the pre-dawn bell Forsythia next to a pond, a thrush lets out a trill. A spring day, I shut myself in as swallows gorge Lethargic hands, the golden needle halts its course Butterflies in pairs waft off from blossoms And race withering flowers in shade in the garden Shivery cold permeates into the green skirt Spring breeze slices through the longing heart Who can understand when the inside is empty In Hwangsayang's villa the color of spring is deepening |
Labels: translation
Have I entered the enchanted peach garden? The flowers bloom everywhere. The love I bear is difficult to put to words. | Have I entered the enchanted peach garden? The flowers bloom everywhere. It is difficult to put into words the love I bear. |
The power of stroke overflowed Waves of blue ocean hovers above | The power of brushstroke overflowed Waves of blue ocean spread like a crown |
Labels: translation
Labels: not on google
Labels: silliness
Close one thereJohn Hiatt (who has an enviable facility with a lyric) in his "Master of Disaster" which, if you like kinda old white blues stuff (infinitely superior to any of the shit that Eric Clapton has been pawning off -- some people just shouldn't give up heroin. Keith Richards, I'm looking at YOU!) is also a pretty cool sounding song.
Choking in clean underwear
Bleeding tongue
Eight ball pounding in my lungs
Ship to shore
I can't see the coastline anymore
I shouldn't be here
I thought I made that loud and clear
.......
China town
Chasing that old dragon down
Madam Wong's
We play the blues with the curtains drawn
Sidewalks of white
While the LA sun beat out the night
Pounding brain
My last transmission down the drain
.......
There's a debt I owe
I'll never pay before I go
So I sing the blues
Hand me down my walking shoes
You're in my heart
Though we may be miles apart
There's my point
I'll see you in another joint
While I was in the lovely town of Colfax I saw something that bugged the marketer in me. I’ve repetitively blogged about how shitty Korea is at promoting itself, but in a small (and new) restaurant in Colfax I saw more living proof.
integrated marketing plan around it.

Labels: comix
"I'm not just spending my time trying to bash other candidates. You know, I believe the best way to win a campaign is to be able to hit the three-point shots from out on the perimeter, not by going up under the goal and elbowing somebody or kneecapping them."
Some nutty wackjobs, or wacky jobnuts (perhaps jobwhacks? Oooh.. oooh.. I like "nutwhacks!"), have decided death is a hot chick.in 2005, the government withdrew its permit after an excommunicated member accused it of forcing followers to worship death and failing to stick to its bylawser.. death has bylaws? Or the church equated not worshipping death with not following bylaws?
Labels: bathroom wisdom
wow.. As an artist I thought Zappa was a self-indulgent sack of shit..
but as a theorist and provocateur, he ruled!
(long ass clip!)
Labels: marketing
Labels: not on google
As I was walking to work the other day it suddenly occurred to me how many damned signs there are on the way, and the wide range of styles they represent. There are signs which date from the 50's to just yesterday and as I wandered along I took pictures of them and wondered if there was any conscious effort to their design. Obviously someone designed them, but how much of that design was just drawing shit and knowing material specifications and how much was what I would call "bullshit?" That is, how much was a designers way of actually making something work - attempting to signify things? Did the odd and mismatched shapes of some signs represent "futurism" or "consumerism" or something else that I can't see as I try to peer back in time?
blanked out contents indicate, this sign is probably not long for the world and there's not much I can say about the use of fonts on it. ;-)
It maximizes its space and probably cost per square inch as well. It is the most formal gridded approach - rectangular. Here is an example of a relatively maximized/functional "monument" style sign:
Somewhere between the Woodhams sign and the purely "functional" sign, is the Safeway sign. The Safeway sign is also a very formal call to the grid, but also wastes a great deal of "see-through" space. At least, in traditional ways, it bounds the space it wastes. That is to say that even the "see-through" sections of the sign are clearly of it and function something like "white space" in a print advertisement. This also looks like it was probably one of the more expensive signs to design and build, so I'm sure there was a lot of "bullshit" behind it's design - I'd have loved to have been a fly on the wall when the architect proposed and sold this design.
is dead easy to read (other than that mysterious "+" in the "C" which is, I think, supposed to indicate that pharmaceuticals are sold inside), but the shape of the sign is 'wasteful' in a purely functional sense, and the fact that the pediment is as impressive and featured as the sign bothers me. It's like building the base of the Statue of Liberty and then tacking a Garden Gnome on it. Proportion is somehow lost.
which make no formal sense (what is with that descending "V"?) The font is also a bit weird, particularly the "Winchester" script, which is difficult to read. The picture doesn't show it, but this sign is not only old by design, but by material as well - the text is outlined in neon, and approach that is almost never used now that LCD and other lighting is cheaper and easier to use.Labels: photography, signs
Labels: not on google
Some professor over here says in his course outline, "The Strunk and White dictum to “omit needless words” will guide our work on writing. Students interested in crafting streamlined, energetic prose and prepared to rewrite may find this class especially congenial. Along with prose composition, students will also receive instruction and practice in researching topics in the humanities."
And then goes on to his course descprition:
The literature and film we will read and view in this course all share the theme of deception. As we encounter narrators who both flaunt and conceal their unreliability as well as those in the act of discovery, we will examine the pressure this theme exerts upon narrative form. How do works about or narrated by liars lend themselves to ever less determinate modernist and postmodernist innovations? We will consider how would-be deceivers’ inventions inevitably reveal as much as they conceal; how social norms motivate deception; why and in what way lies can be said to victimize; and to what degree deception is a necessary component of human life. We will also investigate the way artistic invention and other types of fabrication overlap. For instance, is the liar a figure for the author? Is there an aesthetics of lying? And to what degree is the tendency to lie the same as the impulse to experiment? From the other side, how does readerly credulity mirror the participation of the deceived in their own deception?
Which is 173 words. I give him a C- because in about two minutes I dropped that chunk to 142 words.. That's about a 20% reduction.
Mr. Strunk and White would be proud.The literature and film in this course focus on deception. We will encounter narrators who flaunt and conceal their unreliability, those in the act of discovery, and examine the pressure this exerts on narrative. How do works about or narrated by liars lend themselves to ever less determinate modernist and postmodernist innovations? We will consider how would-be deceivers’ inventions inevitably reveal and conceal; how social norms motivate deception; why and how lies victimize; and to what degree deception is necessary. We will also investigate the way artistic invention and other types of fabrication overlap. For instance, is the liar a figure for the author? Is there an aesthetics of lying? And to what degree is the tendency to lie the same as the impulse to experiment? Alternately, how does readerly credulity mirror the participation of the deceived in their own deception?
Of course a real re-writing could do much more, but I can't be arsed...
I am also not the oldest person to ever receive a Master's Degree as the spring-chicken to the left proves.

Labels: random